THE MYSTERY
Sunday, February 6, 2005
John M. Buchanan
Pastor,
Fourth Presbyterian
Church
Psalm 15
Micah 6:1–4, 6–8
1 Corinthians 1:18–31
“Then Moses went up on the mountain, and
the cloud covered the mountain.” Exodus 24:15 (NRSV)
Great and good God,
give us pure hearts that we may see you,
humble hearts that we may hear you,
hearts of love that we may serve you,
hearts of faith that we may live in you,
reverent hearts that we may worship you,
here and in the world out there,
through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Dag Hammarskjöld
1905–1961
Dear
God, we thank you for this time together. We live busy,
hurried, noisy lives.
And so we are grateful for this time of silence and stillness.
Speak to us today; come to us in word and sacrament.
Startle us once again with your love, in Jesus Christ our
Lord. Amen.
Sometimes
modernity and antiquity intersect in the most interesting
ways.
I was sitting in Santa Fe last weekend in a meeting of
the presidents of our ten Presbyterian theological seminaries
and the presidents of their boards of trustees. I serve
as president of the board of McCormick Theological Seminary
here in Chicago. At the first session on Friday morning,
the coordinator of theological education for the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.), Lee Hinson-Hasty, was to lead the opening
devotions. He began by saying that he was embarrassed because
he forgot to bring a Bible, had searched his room for the
Gideon Bible but someone must have stolen it, but he was
sure that in such an august group of Presbyterians someone
must have a Bible in his or her briefcase. We all poked
around in our briefcases and, lo and behold, no one had
a Bible. That alone produced a fair amount of chuckling
about the role of scripture in Presbyterian theological
education. But then one of the presidents, Phil Butin,
from San Francisco Seminary and clearly way ahead of most
of us in his mastering of information technology, pulled
out a Blackberry, asked what text Lee was looking for,
Googled it, I assume, and a few moments later had it. Lee
asked him to read, and Phil did, slowly, deliberately read,
from the handheld miracle, this amazing symbol of modernity,
venerable and ancient words, thousands of years old, the
Ten Commandments from Exodus 20.
It was, I thought, quite a moment, a moment charged with
an amazing encounter that happens in religion particularly,
between modernity and antiquity.
Our texts this morning, for instance: Moses accepting an
invitation to meet God on the mountaintop and when he arrives
finds nothing but a cloud, and so sits and waits in silence
for six days and then a voice speaks, but doesn’t
say much, just acknowledges Moses’ presence: “Oh,
I see you’re still here.”
And Jesus and Peter, James and John also on a mountaintop,
and there’s that cloud again; Jesus’ face shines
like the sun, and his clothes are dazzling white. Moses
and Elijah show up, and Peter—don’t you just
love Peter—either so overwhelmed with the power of
the moment or scared to death, starts chattering, trying,
I think, to pull this whole strange experience back to
a place he can understand. He says, “Let’s
build. Let’s form a building committee and construct
three dwellings here to mark the spot, memorialize the
moment, maybe a retreat center here on the mountaintop.” The
cloud descends and the voice interrupts his chatter: “This
is my Son, the Beloved, with him I am well pleased. Listen
to him.”
What in the world do you make of these stories: hallucination,
dream, ecstatic vision, literary hyperbole? Modernity and
antiquity collide here dramatically.
For Jesus’ three disciples, Peter, James, and John,
their experience of what we know as the transfiguration
was a day when they saw clearly who Jesus was, the day
they knew deeply in a place in their hearts, deeper, more
real, more authentic than anything they knew with their
minds, that their friend Jesus was the very Son of God.
It was a powerful, indescribably powerful experience for
them, memorialized in art perhaps more authentically than
attempts at rational explanations. In fact in the John
Timothy Stone Chapel there is a triptych of the transfiguration.
Donna Gray told us that during a retreat for our fourth
and fifth graders she took the youngsters into Stone Chapel
in the dark and had them shine a flashlight on the painting
of Jesus with his white robe shining. She said the kids
thought it was pretty cool, and I think that’s a
pretty good way to deal with it—flashlight in the
dark.
I take comfort actually in what Jesus says when it is all
over, whatever it was. There the three of them were, on
the ground, flat on their faces, terrified. And Jesus touches
each of them on the shoulder and says, “Get up and
do not be afraid,” and as they are stumbling down
the mountain, he adds, “Tell no one about the vision.” What
that means, I assume, is that you can’t explain some
things that happen to you and your heart knows are rich
and true. When you try, it doesn’t come out right
and you sound and feel a little foolish. Ever happen to
you? Ever try to explain how deeply moved you were listening
to Beethoven’s “Missa Solemnis” or how,
almost in spite of your rational self, you find tears in
your eyes when you sing the national anthem? Ever try to
tell someone else what it feels like to see the sun rise
or to love someone or to be loved? “Tell no one,” Jesus
said. Some things you can’t describe and explain
rationally. When Luke tells the same story he concludes, “They
kept silent and in those days told no one any of the things
they had seen” (Luke 9:36).
There is a very critical issue here, and it is, how do
we know what we know? It has a wonderful name: epistemology,
the study of how human beings know, the nature and limits
of knowledge. Epistemology is one of the words you learn
in Divinity School and never use again, and they tell you
not to use words like that in sermons because it sounds
show-offy, and, as someone noted, your epistemology will
not get you into heaven, but the topic is very important.
How do you know what you know?
Since the Enlightenment we have been relying more and more
on objective evidence, what we can see, taste, feel, observe,
and analyze. Our epistemology, that is to say, rests on
human reason, on common sense. And so when it comes to
Bible stories like our texts this morning, we have trouble.
But what if there is another way of knowing, not irrational
but somehow different from, or above and beyond, human
reason?
The texts lead in that direction. Moses himself expects
to see God up on the mountain. It is so unique, so awesome,
so dangerous to come into God’s presence that he
leaves behind Joshua and the seventy elders he has brought
along for support and walks the last leg of the journey
alone. And when he reaches the summit he finds—nothing,
a cloud, and so he sits down and waits in silence for six
days.
Sometimes sitting in silence is the best we can do. Sometimes
chattering doesn’t do much. Sometimes pressing for
answers and explanations seems almost to trivialize the
experience. When you sit at the bedside of a dear one,
a friend, who is critically ill, it’s better to sit
in silence than make small talk. When you are privileged
to share with another the facing of the final mystery,
it is better to sit in silence than to offer rational explanations
of what is happening.
Sometimes it is better, as the Bible says, to “be
still and know that I am God.”
Sometimes religion talks too much. Sometimes religion thinks
it knows everything and forgets the mystery and the sitting
in silence.
I occasionally watch Larry King, and I tuned in last week
on the night he was interviewing a few of the leading evangelicals
who are on the cover of Time magazine this week, among
them Franklin Graham and Tim LaHaye, author of the Left
Behind series of books, and his wife. Bishop T. D. Jakes,
of Dallas, pastor and founder of Potter’s House,
a huge megachurch with a very impressive outreach ministry,
was modest, careful, respectful of the opinions and beliefs
of others, was quieter. Graham and LaHaye took my breath
away with how much they had to say on every subject King
brought up, how utterly certain they were about the mind
and will of God on a myriad of issues. There was no mystery.
No acknowledgement that we may not always have access to
God’s heart. There was no silence at all.
Sometimes religion itself needs the reminder that God is
God and we are not, that the God we have come to know remains,
finally, unknowable.
Author Annie Dillard was thinking like that when she wrote,
apropos of our texts, “I have never understood why
so many mystics of all creeds experience the presence of
God on mountaintops. Aren’t they afraid of being
blown away? It often feels best to lie low, inconspicuous,
instead of waving your spirit around from high places like
a lightning rod.” The high churches—like us—Dillard
says, where she belongs, “come at God with an unwarranted
air of professionalism—with authority and pomp, as
though they knew what they were doing” (Pilgrim
at Tinker Creek and Holy the Firm).
Deep in our tradition, our Judeo-Christian tradition, is
respect for the mystery and unknowingness of God.
In 65 BCE, after God’s people had suffered centuries
of warfare, exile, and persecution, the Romans finally
arrived. The Romans were curious about the religion, the
monotheism, of the Jews, particularly the great temple
with its Holy of Holies. The Romans had many temples, many
gods. When Jerusalem itself fell, the Roman general Pompey
entered the temple, found the Holy of Holies at the center,
and, a little like Harrison Ford in Raiders of the
Lost Ark, ripped the curtain with his sword and entered the
space on his horse. He expected to see a statue, an idol,
an altar, a scroll—some object to represent the God
of Israel. What he found was nothing, an empty space, the
very essence of Judaism: mystery and transcendence of the
one God.
At the heart of our faith is a respect, a modesty, a humility
before the mystery and transcendence of God. Our relationship
with God should perhaps begin not with our theological
ideas, our talking and thinking, our reading and writing
and singing and reciting creeds, but with the image of
Moses, surrounded by the eerie mists of the cloud on the
mountain, sitting in silence, waiting.
In communion, in the mystery of bread broken and the cup
shared, the body and the blood of Christ, in the silent
waiting of the Sacrament, there is a moment of intimacy,
of transparency.
I’m reading a wonderful new novel by Marilynne Robinson,
Gilead. It’s about a minister, John Ames,
in his late 70s, slowly dying of heart failure, writing
a letter
to his young son, whom he knows he will not live to see
grow up. He wants to convey to his son something of who
he was and what his life was about.
Today
was Lord’s
Supper, and I preached on Mark 14:22: “And
as they were eating, he took bread and when he had blessed,
he brake it and gave it to them and said, Take ye, this
is my body.” Normally I would not preach on the Words
of Institution themselves when the Sacrament is the most
beautiful illumination of them there could be. But I have
been thinking a great deal about the body these last weeks.
Blessed and broken . . . I want to talk about the gift
of physical particularly and how blessing and sacrament
are mediated through it. I have been thinking how I have
loved my physical life.
In any case, and you may remember this, when almost everyone
had left and the elements were still on the table and
the candles still burning, your mother brought you up
the aisle
to me and said, “You ought to give him some of that.” You’re
too young, of course, but she was completely right. Body
of Christ, broken for you. Blood of Christ, shed for you.
Your solemn and beautiful child face lifted up to receive
these mysteries at my hands. They are the most wonderful
mystery, body and blood. (p. 70)
When
I read that I thought about all the occasions over the
years, all the faces and hands, and the way Communion,
our communion with God, is so personal, so real, that
it isn’t helped by much talking. I thought about
the mystery.
The mystery that is God.
The mystery of God’s love for us
The mystery of Jesus Christ, God’s only Son.
His life lived for us,
The mystery of his death for us,
The joy of his resurrection promise,
The most wonderful mystery, body and blood.
|
|